Skip to main content

Ivy League Graduates Need to be More Content with Perceived "Mediocrity"

The times are tough and the jobs are hard to come by. The grave situation of the world economy is certainly not news, and can be easily seen even with a casual visit to the neighborhood Chinese restaurant. For newly graduated college students of the past couple of years, there could not have been tougher times for starting up a professional career. With little work experience, little practical knowledge, and little professional connections, it is no wonder that many are left behind in the increasingly competitive job market, here in the US and across the world.

While the anxiety and the sorrow behind not being able to find jobs after four years of hard work in college are definitely understandable and worthy of sympathy, the amount of depressing rhetoric that is accompanying the whole situation has been getting a little too hard to stomach for even (newly) jobless new grads like myself. Public sentiment, echoing the gloomy expressions of the printed media, has been convinced that even the most brilliant and well-qualified college grads are in the risk of not being able to support themselves financially for years to come.

Certainly, there is no denying that finding good-paying jobs these days are certainly difficult for college grads. In the past years, the pillars of American undergrad hiring such as consulting and financial sectors have been reducing employment and have seriously cut into fresh hiring. And to deal with the situation, many potential candidates for such jobs have had no choice but to turn to part-time jobs such as those in the services sector (restaurants, retail, etc) and move back in with their parents in order to support themselves financially until the prospects brighten up again.

But the way that most college students and graduates react to seeing fresh grads waiting tables and bumming at home is often too outrageously unjustifiable. Especially in the case of many Ivy League and other top school graduates, they have not been at all reluctant to express their sheer anger in the economy undervaluing their "talents" (or as some secretly prefer, "geniuses"). They have, long since the beginning of their college days, came to the conclusion that they, as the future elite leaders of the world, must be given the solid opportunities to realize their full potential" the moment they step out of their college campuses.

Partially, the elite colleges are to blame for teaching their students intellectual arrogance combined with a complete lack of practical knowledge immediately usable in a real-world workplace. But ultimately, it is the college graduates themselves have are mainly to be blamed for buying into the fairy-tale-like smoothness of such admissions-enhancing propaganda on the part of the colleges. By taking the words of their alma mater at face value, they can only find themselves the inevitable sufferers of job-related depressions.

Their fundamental mistake lies in believing how they are somehow too "superior" for certain jobs. What is wrong with waiting tables anyways? With the need for discipline, politeness, speed, accuracy, and memory, the jobs are highly qualified to be undertaken by college graduates. And contrary to popular beliefs, they are certainly not dead-end jobs for "scums of society." There are plenty of possibility in upward career movements, taking lowly bartenders to corporate managerial positions after years of hard work.

In fact, there are no jobs too "superior" for anyone, only jobs are incompatible with a person's skill set (for a foreigners to do Japanese-language phone sales, for instance). In today's economy, even highly educated people should change their mentality that there exists some sort of strict social hierarchy predetermined by the education levels of individuals. Reality may force anyone to end up anywhere, and people should simply be satisfied that they have jobs at all and can scrap by paycheck-to-paycheck.

If there still is some sort of social hierarchy in modern society, the defining factor should be "effort," not education or some vaguely conceived idea of "intelligence" or "talent." Those try hard, no matter in how "lowly" of a job they start with, will be rewarded by greater pay, faster career advancement, and raise in social status. Unlike what the media and people, there is no dearth of jobs, it is simply that Ivy League graduates are not coming down from their pedestals and looking at the bottom levels. If they want to survive in the society of today, they better start thinking about coming down...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sexualization of Japanese School Uniform: Beauty in the Eyes of the Holders or the Beholders?

The Japanese female high school uniform is almost a cultural institution in itself.  Immortalized in anime such as “Sailor Moon” and countless bittersweet love stories of campus romance on the big and small screens, its distinctive blue-and-white sailor-like design is recognizable to even the most casual purveyors of Japanese culture.  For millions in Japan, it is the visual manifestation of what it means to be youthful, innocent, and full of hope and drama.  It is the physical reminder of the coming of age.

Asian Men Are Less "Manly"?!

ok, this isn't a new topic...plenty of people have written about the fact that Asian men are perceived as comparatively not masculine in popular culture (not just here in the USA, but also in Asia itself). White male models are used for underwear advertising, black males are used for adult videos (ok, maybe that one is just biological...but still), and as everyone knows, interracial couples with Asian females are much much more common than with Asian males (and because of that, Asian guys who get non-Asian girls, especially white ones, gains incredible respect from his Asian male friends as long as the girl is not too ugly).

Instigator and Facilitator: the Emotional Distraught of a Mid-Level Manager

Among the intellectuals of the world, there has long been a consensus on the defining quality of individual success.  It is not measured by the amount of cash in one's bank account, the net worth of one's business, assets, and properties.  Instead, the key word is "power," the authority one has over other individuals and functioning of a community, and to a greater extent, society in general.  The ability to influence and to change the course of other's lives, in particular, can be seen an easy, albeit morally reprehensible, way to get one's hands on an almost unlimited flow of cash.