Exit from Rocket Internet: Reflecting on the Human Aspect
It has been nearly one and a half years since the author
first took up those mysterious Skype calls (and then a dubious-looking
employment offer) from Malaysia ,
and flew on a three-day notice from London
to Kuala Lumpur . And it has been nearly one year since taking
up the post of Vice President of Operations at the Lazada Philippines office
after another one-week notice to fly to Manila . And as the employment contract finally draws
to a close, perhaps it is a time to evaluate the whole journey before the last
goodbyes.
As can be read from the last paragraph, Rocket Internet and
all of its incubated ventures goes by a clear principle of speed over
everything else. Projects, from the
smallest of hiring another guy (from another continent) to the largest of
venturing into a new business/sub-business, involves quick decision-making and
executions, sometimes with extremely murky details and little forethought on
the impacts of those decisions made. “To
get things done” is why many people are hired, including the author.
To go into intricate details on how the speed factor affects
the performance and general directions of the ventures would be a
time-consuming task requiring pages and pages of examples, so the author would
hesitate to proceed. Yet, from a
personnel standpoint, the effect is a bit more clear-cut and perhaps the author
can offer some thoughts for so many people out there that pay attention to or
involved in the global phenomenon that is the Rocket Internet universe.
To any outsider or insider, it is certainly impressive that
Rocket has been able to set up new businesses, often using a small team of
three to four initial members, in far-flung places where the starting members
(and Rocket executives) often have little on-the-ground knowledge. And the businesses are set up in span of a
few months, expanding from those few core members to sometimes hundreds of
employees. All this can be attributed to
massive hiring of local talent in the short time period.
To get the local connections (often for supplier relations
in many of its ecommerce ventures) and knowledge (for instance, on legal or HR
practices), the best and the brightest of local specialists are first poached
from competitors, using high salaries and promises of quick advancements as a
draw. Given wages sometimes double the
current job, and nice management titles, Rocket has been highly successful in
leveraging deep pockets to acquire strong local middle management in short
periods of time.
The method start to not work as well when applied to latter
management candidate or people occupying lower levels of the corporate
hierarchy. Due to increasing structural
and procedural setup, each new candidate that joins latter on is faced with
much more specific tasks and specific positions from Day 1. Under such restrictions, the standard method
of promising grandiose benefits in career advancement often does not align with
the reality on the ground, and higher levels of disillusionment becomes more
inevitable.
The result, of course, is a higher turn-over of personnel as
the company becomes more established and mature, as those whose expectations
are not met (or at least so they believe) seek out greener pastures. Yet, because the venture in question, amidst
all this, is busy setting up and moving forward on new projects, he tasks done
by any person leaving the company is not properly handed over to anyone else
(usually due to time constraints, or more often, lack of anyone to really take
over the tasks).
The frequent disconnect, then, starts to affect the
consistency of daily operations, at least in the eyes of employees who have
been in the venture for relatively longer period of time. New people come in with new ideas, disregard
the old ones (often not intentionally, but jut because they don’t know much
about them) and disrupt existing procedures and cultures in the most subtle yet
frustrating ways. When the replacement
is good, people are happy and all is well, but if not, it is difficult to point
out exactly what went wrong.
As the author go through the last weeks of his tenure at
Rocket Internet, he is starting to blindly accept this phenomenon as fact of
life in a fast-moving start-up venture that, for better or worse, moves the whole
business ahead in some direction. For
those involved, it ought to be considered much more exciting than any corporate
bureaucracy. For those that are
sidelined, it may be a more dismaying situation where they feel the need to
extricate themselves faster to rid association with things that are no longer
theirs.
I guess maybe there needs to be more revised guidelines on how the aid-giving institutions decide to graduate certain countries. Evidently, being economically ready for "normal development" (at least seen from an aid-giver's perspective) does not automatically equal to having the institutions and civic mentalities to ensure proper fair distributions for the fruits of development.
ReplyDeletefor the first, I think that since Rocket is more interested in selling off its ventures at some point rather than trying to develop them themselves into likes of Amazon (at least not at the same scale), the matter of long-term planning is not really thought out.
ReplyDeleteBut even if there is a long-term plan on the ground, the foreign management is probably not as interested in executing them piecemeal as compared to other companies, precisely because many of them have no plans to stay at the venture they manage for the long-term.
As for business model, it is standard ones being used across the world. Sure, there has to be some localization at some level, but considering the investors tend to be foreign as well, standardized KPIs rather than "localization" would be a bigger factor in development of the business.