Into the World:
The Random Thoughts in My Mind

In recent years, major train stations in Tokyo have been increasingly home to a new type of poster. Amidst ubiquitous ads for commercial products and services are government-issued notices encouraging citizens to look out for terrorist activities. Frequently highlighting scared citizens at the front and center, these posters call upon citizens to report to the local police on any sort of suspicious persons and activities, under various slogans that state that "preventing terrorism is the responsibility of all citizens." Highly trafficked train stations, as the posters imply, ought to be the focus of vigilant citizens.

As an avid reader of the Economist magazine, I often admire the publication's willingness to take a more pragmatic approach to advance a progressive agenda that it cherishes. The "progressive pragmatism" the magazine shows is on full display when it comes to the issue of international migration. On one hand, the Economist is unabashedly pro-migration, arguing that a freer movement of workers would greatly boost productivity and wealth in destination countries. But on the other hand, the magazine concedes that hostility toward migrants is a reality in the same destination countries, and new practical thinking is needed to appease the anti-migration crowd.

The elite in every country, first and foremost, is defined by money. Your normal middle-class person cannot fathom the amount of money a member of the elite has. It is not just about the ability to buy whatever material goods or services without having to worry about budgeting to not run out of money. Instead, there is so much money in their bank accounts that they can buy up entire companies, start brand-new ones, and pay to make governments and laws work for them so that they can continue to retain and increase the amount of their wealth across multiple generations.

While the world and its major media outlets are fixated on the ongoing protests in Hong Kong and across South America, the never-ending problems faced by fragile governments in the Middle East, as always, gets pushed to the back of the collective mind. As the civil war and subsequent refugee problem in Syria amply demonstrate, the world has become too callous toward the chaos that originates in the Middle East and is becoming all too complacent and willing to assume that the region will be surrounded by unending violence and suffering that outsiders have little power to stop or control.

The atmosphere is absolutely relaxing. An extra-long wooden sofa with plump fluffy cushion in a leafy courtyard. Playing in the background are acoustic covers of some of Japan's most famous pop songs from the 1990s. Next to the sofa is a stand serving up carbonated blueberry juice and coffee from Myanmar. Customers lounging around on the sofa are quietly sipping their drinks while reading copies of artistic magazines describing the most innovative architecture and delicious specialty food stores around Tokyo under a windy but sunny cloudless sky.

Older Japanese men are not the most politically correct when it comes to expressing their opinions. After decades of managing younger people as top-level salarymen and getting what they want both during and after work , many become highly intolerant of situations in which things do not go the way they are supposed to based on social conventions and commonly understood protocols. Even as powerless retirees, they somehow continue to believe in their responsibility and necessity to help defend "the way things are," just as they have as career salarymen maintaining a stable corporate culture in major Japanese firms.

It almost seems deliberate just how Joker is timed to match the real-world protests happening around the world. The recently premiered film that traces the origin of the most famous villain of Batman features a growing tension of the rich and the poor in a Gotham that has seen public services fall apart as conservative politicians cut back government funding to supposedly help the poor stand on their own feet. The movie begins with one mentally problematic man's journey to navigate a city that seems to be turning its back on people like him by the day but ends with thousands of anarchists taking to the streets to destroy the physical symbols of the powerful and the rich monopolizing the power to dedicate the city's future.